The Depopulation Conspiracy

The Depopulation Conspiracy

Conspiracy rating - 2 (Mostly True)


While we’d like to believe that governments exist to promote the general welfare of its citizens, the facts of history do not bear this out. Many thinkers, like Bill Gates, Charles Darwin and Henry Kissinger have publicly put forth ideas that openly suggest there are far too many “useless eaters” on our planet. And, in order to preserve the balance of nature, periodic culling of the human population is not only necessary, but justified, from time to time.

If you don’t think that governments and their leaders would actually act on these ideas, think again. From the eugenics movement in the 19th century to the barbarism of the Nazi’s Final Solution for the Jews and other undesirables, to the nefarious depopulation plans of the Clue of Rome and the global Covid-19 mRNA “vaccine” program which has proven deadlier and less effective than any vaccine in history — there is plenty of evidence that the Depopulation Conspiracy is real and active today.

Malthus Justified Depopulation in the U.K.: 1766-1834

The Depopulation Conspiracy was born in the early 19th century through Malthusian ideology. It states that too many people consume too many resources. This inevitably leads to societal collapse and a loss of government control. It’s a fearful fantasy without a basis in science. It justifies mass murder in order to strengthen the current social order.

Thomas Robert Malthus - grandfather of the De-Fertility conspiracy

Thomas Malthus, 1833

Thomas Malthus was a pessimist. He theorized that humans are like animals who will reproduce as much as they can, until the environment’s natural resources are exhausted, or until the food supply is diminished.

In both cases, the expectations under Malthusian ideology are that the population, now lacking food and resources, enters a state of panic. This is followed by mass chaos, with a bloody revolution against the government as the final outcome.

This ideology led some powerful and wealthy people to create a “health” movement called eugenics. It actively promoted methods that either weakened or terminated human life: vaccination, sterilization and abortion.

On its surface, the eugenics movement, then, and even now, claims to serve “the common good” for the betterment of all humanity. However, its ultimate goal is to reduce the world’s population to what it states is a more “sustainable” level. The intended result that is never talked about in the public, however, is to preserve the world’s natural resources for the ultra wealthy and those whom they deem as worthy.

This method of depopulation is achievable, they claim, without disrupting the economic and political status quo.

Eugenics and Forced Sterilization in the USA: 1907-1927

Eugenics argues that genetics determines life outcomes. It seeks to manage and improve upon the human population through genetic selection, much like how we manage herds of animal livestock.

The eugenics movement started in America with pseudo scientific beliefs. Chief among them were Charles Darwin’s unproven theory of evolution and the “survival of the fittest.” This justified government restrictions on who can and cannot have children.

In the early 20th century, many U.S. states enacted laws that gave the government the right to sterilize the “unfit” in their custody: criminals, sexual deviants, prostitutes and imbeciles.

By 1927, twenty-five states had implemented sterilization laws. California had the most prolific program performing 4,636 sterilizations and castrations between 1907 and 1925. In 1927, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the State of Virginia’s sterilization plan in Buck vs Bell, which affirmed that the state had the right to sterilize mentally deficient residents to prevent them from “producing more of their kind.”

Nazi Depopulation Conspiracy: 1933-1945

Taking the American eugenics movement even further, Nazi Germany believed that forced sterilization was not enough to adequately protect humanity. They thought that active elimination (murder) of the “unfit” was necessary to ensure that their negative attributes would not be passed on to future generations.

This is how the Nazi party justified rounding up Jews, homosexuals, criminals, eastern Europeans, and imbeciles in the 1930s. In order to purify Germany and lead the world, these people must be removed from society.

Hitler believed he was doing good and was actually supported by most doctors and nurses at the time. His Law for the Prevention of Progeny with Hereditary Diseases was modeled after American eugenic theory and legislation.

Nazi policy encouraged racially "acceptable" couples to have as many children as possible

Nazi policy encouraged racially “acceptable” couples to have as many children as possible. Because of the number of children in this Nazi Party official’s family, the mother earned the “Mother’s Cross.”
Source: DIZ Muenchen GMBH, Sueddeutscher Verlag Bilderdienst

At the same time, the Nazis promoted “superior Nordic” people to have more children in order to help “improve the nation” by strengthening its genetic stock.

Germany’s systematic extermination policy was tacitly supported by eugenicists in America. As early as 1941, before U.S. involvement in World War II, American intelligence agencies knew about the genocide occurring inside the Nazi death camps.

There is also ample evidence that the the Third Reich was financed by American banks: JP Morgan, American Express, and Bank of the City of New York. Further, American corporations like IBM, General Motors and Ford maintained their stream of unbroken profits by continuing to do business with the Nazis throughout the war.

This is how the world allowed 10+ million people to be murdered by a demented German government infused with eugenics.

The Club of Rome: 1970-present

It took several decades after the horrors of World War II for the eugenics movement to raise its ugly head again. In 1970 an international think tank named the Club of Rome published an alarming proposal The Predicament of Mankind.

They called for an immediate reduction in world population in order to defuse a “population bomb” that would eventually destroy the world. In 1972, they published the best-selling book Limits to Growth, that promoted their ideas to the general public. This was the genesis of the Neo-eugenics movement.

Their argument was essentially Malthusian. They claimed a growing population would outstrip Earth’s resources, leading to chaos, famine, economic collapse and environmental destruction.

Despite decades of dire warnings championed by Club of Rome scientists like Paul R. Ehrlich, the group’s predictions have yet to come true. The sky is always falling, or about to fall, and yet their hysterical warnings don’t stop!

world poverty 1970-2015In 1970, when they first published their dark prophecies, Earth’s population was 3.7 billion people. Now in 2023, there are 8.1 billion, yet less people live in poverty and more people have basic literacy.

Amazingly, the world has not collapsed! On the contrary, humanity has flourished. The standard of living around the world has improved for the average person with less people than ever living in extreme poverty.

Their horrible record as prophets of gloom and doom haven’t stopped the Club of Rome from promoting Neo-eugenics policies. Instead, some of their policy goals today are One-Child laws, medically assisted suicide, banning meat and the elimination of hydrocarbon fuels.

“Family Planning” – A Euphemism for Mass Depopulation

Also in 1970, Congress passed the Family Planning Services and Population Research Act. This act allocated $383 million for contraceptive programs, including government grants to hospitals that performed sterilizations, in an attempt to reduce the number of welfare recipients.

In many cases, hospitals operated on racial minority women who were unaware of the sterilization procedures they were undergoing. Sterilization for women increased 350 percent between 1970 and 1975. About one million American women were sterilized each year! It seems to have been motivated by a racist eugenics agenda. According to a 1973 Health Research Group study and interviews conducted by Doctor Bernard Rosenfeld in 1974 and 1975:

“The majority of physicians were white, Euro-American males who believed that they were helping society by limiting the number of births in low-income, minority families. They assumed that they were enabling the government to cut funding for Medicaid and welfare programs.”

Legalized Abortion: 1973

The 1973 landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade made abortion a protected right under the law. The justification for abortion was a woman’s “right to choose” and was framed under feminist ideals of equality.

abortionHowever, the real agenda behind legalized abortion may have been to kill more children from poor, black families.

A disproportionate number of women who have abortions come from African American families. The abortion rate is three to five times higher among black women than among white women. It’s a way to allow the “unfit” to kill their own children in order to limit population of the so-called “undesirables.”

Margaret Sanger, the founder of abortion provider Planned Parenthood, accepted that eugenics was, “the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems.” She agreed with eugenicists that,

“The unbalance between the birth rate of the ‘unfit’ and the ‘fit’” was “the greatest present menace to civilization.” Particularly “in a democracy like that of the United States,” where “[e]quality of political power has . . . been bestowed upon the lowest elements of our population,” Sanger worried that, “reckless spawning carries with it the seeds of destruction.”

U.S. Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas has spoken extensively on the connection between eugenics and the pro-abortion movements:

“Many eugenicists . . . supported legalizing abortion and abortion advocates — including future Planned Parenthood President Alan Guttmacher — endorsed the use of abortion for eugenic reasons.”

Even Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, a hero of U.S. liberal politics, commented in 2009 that Roe v. Wade was all about reducing the population of undesirable people – not women’s rights.

“Frankly I had thought that at the time [Roe v. Wade] was decided,” Ginsburg told her New York Times Magazine interviewer, Emily Bazelon, “there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”

Genetic Testing to Reduce Population

Genetic testing recently has allowed parents to abort children who may be considered “retarded” today. In the past, these were the “imbeciles” of the eugenics movement who should be culled from the herd.

And selective child bearing to weed out the mentally deficient through abortion is not the only test parents have made. It also has been used to select for gender preferences throughout the world. In China and India, 100 million female babies have been aborted because of the cultural preference for boys.

A 2021 article in the Harvard law review concluded that legalized abortion advanced the eugenicist movement:

“While abortion is not a eugenics conspiracy — a deliberate plot to reduce the size of the African American, female, or disabled populations — it remains an undeniable fact that the aborted are disproportionately racial minorities, female, and those with disabilities.”

The facts can’t be denied: government support for abortion is used to advance the eugenics movement while cloaked under a “woman’s right to choose.” The right to choose who lives and who dies – to select certain desirable traits in order to better the human race – is at the heart of eugenics and the Depopulation Conspiracy.

The Kissenger Report: 1974

Henry Kissenger

Henry Kissinger: U.S. Secretary of State and National Security Adviser to Presidents Nixon and Ford, 1969-77.

U.S. National Security Study Memorandum #200, also known as “Kissinger Report,” is a well-known government document that supports the Depopulation Conspiracy.

It is the only publicly available government policy paper we found that defines reduced fertility as a goal in order to control population growth.

Highlights of the memo:

  1. Alarming projections for population growth in poor, developing countries
  2. The famines that would likely result
  3. Damages to a “fragile environment”
  4. Access to fuel and minerals “could impinge on the U.S.”
  5. A “severe drag on rates of economic development”
  6. World population growth would create many “national security problems for the U.S.” and “food riots, separatist movements, communal massacres, revolutionary actions and counter-revolutionary coup[s]” in developing countries.

This CONFIDENTIAL report recommended reducing human fertility as the solution to these threats:

“…if future [global population] numbers are to be kept within reasonable bounds, it is urgent that measures to reduce fertility be started and made effective in the 1970’s and 1980’s… Intense efforts are required to assure full availability by 1980 of birth control information and means to…the poor.”

The fact that this was a confidential report, not intended for public consumption, proves that the authors knew their recommendations might raise alarms about ethical and perhaps even criminal violations.

Declining Sperm Counts: 1973-2011

One effective way to reduce human fertility is through long-term chemical castration of males.

An April 2022 meta study published in the British Columbia Medical Journal found that sperm concentration declined 52.4%, and total sperm counts declined 59.3% in studies completed in North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand from 1973 to 2011.


Sperm counts have been declining around the world since 1970

Since this study, sperm counts appear to be continuing to decline rather than stabilizing. Recent studies from South America, Asia and Africa confirmed the decline in sperm count was not just an issue in North America and Europe.

Although this does not directly correlate to a 50-60% decline in birth rates, it is still a disturbing long-term trend. Possibly as a result, these countries had their population growth rates decline by about 50-60% since 1970.

Correlation does not prove causality but it is certainly suspicious. And this trend is projected to continue. The population growth rate in North America and Europe is expected to permanently go negative starting in 2040.

But how is this happening?

Demographic trends may explain why populations decline in developed countries. Higher education rates among women has delayed childbirth, and family formation. However, there are greater environmental factors at play that actively reduce sperm counts and population.

Poisoning the Food Supply

“Who controls the food supply controls the people.”Henry Kissinger, 1973

Since the alarm about the “population bomb” was sent out by the Club of Rome, there have been significant changes to the Western food supply. Grocery stores once were filled with mostly raw and fermented foods. Now, our supermarkets primarily carry industrially processed and chemically manipulated food-like products.

The biggest impact on declining sperm counts and male infertility is excess estrogen (female hormone) primarily due to plastic poisoning in the food supply.

Plastic water bottles, baby bottles, food cans lined with plastic (BPA), plastic food storage bags and plastic bins are just some of the ways plastics get into what we eat. Other everyday products contain plastic in the form of phthalates: plastic clothes, synthetic fragrances, detergents, soaps, air fresheners, as well as carpets, car interiors and home flooring.


One supposed “health food,” un-fermented soy, is suspected to lower sperm counts. It activates estrogen production in men, which lowers sperm counts. It is found in tofu, soy oils (the most widely used oil in processed food), soy milk, soy burgers, soy protein isolate, lecithin, and soy baby formula. Infants who are fed soy formula consume the equivalent of up to 10 contraceptive pills a day!

(Please note that fermented soy does not have this effect. Miso, tempeh, soy sauce, and tamari are all fermented soy products. The fermentation process significantly lessens the protease inhibitors and phytates in soy, almost to the point of elimination.)

Lower sperm counts aren’t just a problem if you want to have children. A lower sperm count also correlates to a shorter life span. This makes soy a great product for the depopulation agenda.

The poisoning of the food supply is a conspiracy theory by itself. Hundreds of books have exposed the toxic effects of pesticides, GMOs, Trans Fats and artificial sweeteners, just to name a few of the legal poisons we eat. Still, there is a lot of evidence that chemicals from plastics in the food supply have lowered sperm counts worldwide, which correlates to a smaller population.

This video reviews the evidence today about the connection between declining sperm counts and plastics, if you want to learn more:

Fluoride in the Water Supply

Man-made fluoride is derived from Sodium Fluoride. It is a toxic waste by-product of industrial chemical production, specifically the phosphate fertilizer industry and the aluminum smelting industry.

Incredibly, fluoride has been promoted as the primary way to prevent tooth decay. According to the American Dental Association (ADA), fluoride in the water supply improves dental health. This claim has justified adding fluoride into 73% of municipal water supplies in North America.

fluoride in drinking waterHowever, the proclaimed benefit of fluoride as a way of preventing dental decay is perhaps the greatest “scientific” fraud ever perpetrated upon an unsuspecting public, according to the Weston A. Price foundation.

To illustrate how toxic fluoride is, the medical journal The Lancet classified it as a neurotoxin along with other very harmful chemicals like mercury and lead!

Could fluoride in the water supply be a contributing factor to lower sperm counts and lower fertility rates? The evidence says, “yes.”

Over 60 animal studies have found that fluoride adversely impacts the male reproductive system. The effects — which have been observed in rats, mice, chickens, and rabbits — include:

  1. decreases in testosterone levels
  2. reduced sperm motility
  3. altered sperm morphology
  4. reduced sperm quantity
  5. increased oxidative stress
  6. reduced capacity to breed

Consistent with the animal research, studies of human populations have reported finding associations between fluoride exposure and damage to the male reproductive system.

Most notably, a scientist at the Food & Drug Administration reported in 1994 that populations in the United States with more than 3 ppm fluoride in their water had lower “total fertility rates” than populations with lower fluoride levels. While 3 ppm is a higher concentration than used in water fluoridation programs (0.7 to 1.2 ppm), it is still considered a “safe” level by the EPA.

Remarkably, the Nazis put fluoride in the water supply for prisoners of their death camps. Why? The fluoride sterilizes people and makes them more docile (from the book: The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben by Joseph Borkin).

Chemicals in the Air: 2002-present

“We will use soft metals, aging accelerators and sedatives in
food and water, also in the air.

They will be blanketed by poisons everywhere they turn.

The soft metals will cause them to lose their minds. We will
promise to find a cure from our many fronts, yet we will
feed them more poison.

The poisons will be absorbed trough their skin and mouths,
they will destroy their minds and reproductive systems.

From all this, their children will be born dead, and we will conceal
this information.

The poisons will be hidden in everything that surrounds them,
in what they drink, eat, breathe and wear.” – The Secret Covnenant

The above quote is from a mysterious, controversial document released on (currently offline) in June of 2002.

Regardless of the legitimacy of “The Secret Covenant,” poisons in the air have been killing people for decades. The U.S. National Academy of Sciences estimates that 107,000 people die every year in the USA from airborne chemical toxins used in factories, vehicles and farms.


Chemtrails are streaks of toxic clouds – not water condensation trails – that are created behind airplanes.

Then there are sprays of toxic metals in our skies. These are known as “Chemtrails” which are their own conspiracy theory (watch the documentary  “UNconventional Grey”).

These metals: aluminum, barium, strontium and cadmium are known toxins that make us sick when we breathe and drink them. For more information on this controversial subject, see Dane Wiggington’s extensive research at There is very compelling evidence that this threat is real and has been active for at least 50 years.

Much like ‘Family Planning’ is a euphemism for mass depopulation, ‘Climate Engineering’ is a euphemism for airborne chemical poisoning.

If nothing else, it makes you wonder. Why would someone write in 2002, “They will be blanketed by poisons everywhere they turn. The soft metals will cause them to lose their minds.” Then, for the next 20 years we see these strange unnatural chemtrail clouds above us in the sky?

Could these chemtrails, along with other poisons in our water and food, help explain dramatically declining sperm counts? There is much speculation about how a cocktail of environmental poisons can create a more dangerous synergy where the combination is more harmful than the sum of the individual poisons.

The Common Enemy of Humanity is Man: United Nations Agenda 2030

At the top of the United Nations (U.N.) Agenda 2030 for sustainable development is the goal to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. The claim is that CO2 and other greenhouse gases (mostly methane from cow farts) are pollutants that cause the climate to change/warm up. This is supposedly a threat to humanity.

UN Agenda 2030Their urgent argument states that if we don’t reduce carbon emissions now, we will have no viable future because the earth will be horribly polluted, hot and unlivable.

Does this sound familiar? Because it should. It’s Neo-eugenics ideology.

The U.N. Agenda 2030, when read carefully, is a declaration of war against anything that produces CO2 and methane. The hydrocarbon (oil, coal and natural gas) industry, the meat (beef, pork and chicken) industry and really any business that uses energy is targeted. We have relied on cheap, abundant energy and the resultant food to grow worldwide population in the 20th century from 1.3 billion to over 8 billion today.

Most concerning is the fact that when we exhale, every human produces CO2! Therefore, the war against carbon emissions and climate change is not only a war against energy use and meat consumption. It is a war against people and life itself.

At our very foundation, we are carbon based organisms. The intent to reduce carbon emissions is, by definition, an intent to reduce the world’s population!

Interestingly, in 1991, immediately after the collapse of the Soviet Union, our old friends at the Club of Rome issued a new book titled The First Global Revolution. In it, they declared global warming as the new pretext to wage war on humanity, under the guise of “saving the planet” – as detailed in a 2023 documentary: No Farmers, No Food: Will You Eat The Bugs?

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famines and the like would fit the bill…these phenomena do constitute a common threat which demands solidarity of all peoples…The real enemy then is humanity itself.” – The Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution

U.N. Agenda 2030 has declared war against farmers in order to seize control of the global food supply and further reduce the population. Farmers in countries like the Netherlands have had to battle against their own climate-zealous government just to maintain their right to farm and grow food!

Agenda 2030 is worthy of a conspiracy article itself since it is full of many other nefarious plans which can’t be covered in detail here. Most important to understand is that a worldwide reduction in energy and meat production will inevitably shorten the life spans for billions of people.

And, once again, that seems to be the real goal – depopulation.

Georgia Guidestones: 1980-2022

the georgia guidestones are direct evidence of a depopulation conspiracy

The Georgia Guidestones laid out the objective and reasons to depopulate the world.

The Georgia guidestones may offer a big clue as to who is behind the Neo-eugenics movement and Depopulation Conspiracy in America.

The stones were quietly placed in 1980 in a remote area of Georgia, USA. They were massive and obviously crafted with great effort and care

On their face, ominous directions were carved into the rock that seem to call for a Neo-eugenics movement:

  • Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
  • Guide reproduction wisely – improving fitness and diversity.
  • Be not a cancer on the Earth – Leave room for nature.

The guidestones were mysteriously, and without notice, destroyed in 2022 at the height of the Plandemic lock-downs. Perhaps, someone wanted to erase evidence of the Neo-eugenic Depopulation Conspiracy?

If the messages in the stones were sincere, someone wanted to reduce the world’s population by 7.5 billion people!

Billionaire Ted Turner, who grew up and lived nearby in Atlanta Georgia, advocated for eugenics policies that would reduce the population. In this quote, he shares his concern over maintaining his luxurious lifestyle due to the “starving hordes” who aim to consume his natural resources:

“…one out of four people in the world don’t get enough to eat or have access to good water. It’s not reasonable to expect we’ll be able to continue to live so high on the hog when we’re surrounded by so many starving hoards.” – Ted Turner

The Covid19 Gene Therapy Shots: 2021-23

We won’t call the COVID19 shots “vaccines” because that’s simply not what they are. They are actually a gene therapy drug.

COVID19 shot

The COVID19 shots damage male and female reproduction and have lead to premature deaths for far too many.

Through mRNA technology, the shots change human genetics. Presumably, our genetics needed to be changed in order to protect against a “new and deadly” variant virus.

However, once you understand that a virus has never caused any disease, you can see how any “vaccine” is a poison, shot into the body.

Unfortunately, there is ample evidence that COVID19 was a planned terrorist attack on the world in order to scare people to take these gene therapy drugs.

We now know these shots were never effective in preventing disease symptoms or death from COVID19. In fact, public health outcomes are dramatically worse since the rollout of these “vaccines.” No other “vaccine” in history has harmed so many people, and it’s not even close.

Deaths among young people have surged at alarming rates. According to U.S. CDC and NCHS data, excess mortality among 0 to 24-year-olds has hit new highs in 2022, with a seven-week average of 41.7% more deaths than anticipated.

It’s natural to ask, “If not for disease and death prevention, then what was the purpose behind these injections, so strongly and aggressively pursued by government agencies?”

Could these shots be the latest iteration of the Depopulation Conspiracy? In addition to excess mortality, the shots appear to destroy human fertility.

Damage to Female Reproduction from COVID19 Shots

Naomi Wolf has publicized research that reveals damages to female reproduction as a direct cause of the COVID19 shots.

Research by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health suggests that COVID19 shots, or the body’s response to them, can lead to unexpected vaginal bleeding in women. This phenomenon was observed in women across different reproductive stages.

The paper, “Unexpected vaginal bleeding and COVID-19 vaccination in nonmenstruating women,” published in Science Advances, showed unexpected vaginal bleeding in 3.3% of postmenopausal women, 14.1% of perimenopausal women, and 13.1% of premenopausal women. This is more than three times the expected rates.

Around half of the women who reported unexpected vaginal bleeding experienced it within 28 days after a COVID-19 vaccination. This damning information was never intended to be made available to the public. It was only made available by a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by a group of European medical professionals.

Dr. Peter A. McCullough reported that lipid nanoparticles in the COVID19 shots have been known for years to be taken up by reproductive glands (ovaries and testis). Thus, these “vaccines” loaded with lipid nanoparticles, appear to be, almost by design, destined to influence ovulatory cycles, thus interfering with the complex and delicate human reproductive cycle.

In another very large study on 14,153 women, called “The Effect of Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 on the Menstrual Cycle (the EVA Project),” 78% reported experiencing menstrual cycle changes after vaccination.

In summary, the most predominant menstrual changes were more menstrual bleeding (43%), more menstrual pain (41%), delayed menstruation (38%), fewer days of menstrual bleeding (34.5%), and shorter cycle length (32%).

COVID19 Vaccine’s Adverse Effects on Male Reproduction

Male reproductive capacity was also adversely affected by the shots.

February 2021 research documents from vaccine maker Pfizer lists, “anti-sperm antibody positive” among its 1,290 Adverse Events of Special Interest.

According to inviTRA, a certified medical magazine created by doctors and fertility experts,

“The presence of antisperm antibodies (ASA) in the ejaculate is an immune cause of male infertility. The adhesion of antibodies to sperm affects their motility, making the sperm’s journey to the egg highly difficult or even impossible.”

On June 22, 2022, Andrology published a bombshell study, “Covid-19 vaccination BNT162b2 temporarily impairs semen concentration and total motile count among semen donors.” The study, which did not even include the effects of additional booster injections, showed a staggering drop in male fertility. It showed an average decrease of 22.1% across the study group, from the initial injections alone.

The study concluded, “Systemic immune response after BNT162b2 vaccine is a reasonable cause for transient semen concentration and TMC (total motile count) decline.”

So, COVID19 shots decrease the fertility for men and women. Who would want that…?

Evidence of the Depopulation Conspiracy in COVID19 Shots?

In addition to harms to human fertility, the COVID shots are clearly killing people, as mentioned earlier. Even according to government media, the death toll is already in the thousands, as of March 2022.

The U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, known as VAERS, reports that the COVID19 vaccines caused 36,000 deaths. These are officially “unverified” deaths.

Since VAERS is a voluntary reporting system, a Harvard Pilgrim study estimated that the amount of reported injuries and deaths is actually under-reported by a factor of 10, at least. This means that 360,000 Americans may have died from the shots.

Cause Unkown bookReinforcing the VAERS data, Edward Dowd, a former hedge fund manager at Blackrock, has done extensive analysis of government statistics and life insurance company records. The data strongly suggests that the COVID19 shots are responsible for enormous harm in the years 2021-2022.

His conservative estimate is that the human cost from COVID-19 shots could encompass approximately 300,000 deaths, 1.36 million disabilities, and 26.6 million injuries – just in the USA! These are deaths not attributed to the COVID19 plandemic or any subsequent “variants” of the so-called virus. His book Cause Unknown lays out the data in a very compelling way.

Another study (not yet peer-reviewed) by Correlation Research in the Public Interest based on data from southern hemisphere countries concludes there are likely to have been 17 million COVID19 vaccine-related deaths worldwide, as of Sept. 2, 2023.

How could the shots kill so many and so quickly?

A September 2023 scientific study definitively proved that the shots cause a significant increased risk of heart damage (myocarditis and pericarditis) in ALL people, not just young men as previously thought.

Thousands of people of all ages, but especially younger healthy people, have mysteriously “died unexpectedly” from “cause unknown“.

We suspect that more evidence will eventually come out that shows the true cause of the unexpected, unknown and sudden deaths to be from the COVID19 shots. Once we find that the shots were designed by U.S. government agencies (NIH, NIAID or DoD) to cause harm, then we have the key evidence.

However, at this time, we do not have the “smoking gun” that proves a conspiracy existed within parts of the government to deliberately harm people through COVID shots.

Cui Bono?

Who benefits from the Depopulation Conspiracy?

Obviously, the wealthiest 0.1 percent in the world have the most to gain. Once the common people have been greatly reduced and weakened, these Illuminati, as they are often called, will experience a new level of domination, wealth and control.

Bill Gates and his eugenics family lead the depopulation conspiracy

Bill Gates carries on the work espoused by Adolf Hitler and Margaret Sanger – population control leading to the establishment of a master race.

Artificial intelligence is making human labor less necessary. It’s logical that big businesses don’t need as many workers. A human labour pool that is excessive, unemployed, and hungry is a threat to the ruling elite.

Corporations have a legal obligation to reduce costs in order to increase profits. Employees who depend upon salaries, medical care and retirement plans are viewed as a liability rather than a resource. They have been called “useless eaters.”

It’s conceivable that those who consider themselves superior, perhaps even a member of a master race, and worthy of determining who lives and dies, could conclude that it’s time to cull the herd and depopulate.

Their motto might be: It’s good for business. It’s good for the planet. It’s good for us. And it’s good for the human race!

Who in our world might think this way? Those who consider themselves superior. Examples:

  • Billionaires, like Ted Turner, who believe the population must be reduced in order to maintain their lavish, “high on the hog” way of life.
  • Descendants of the Nazis, like World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab whose father was a Nazi collaborator.
  • Descendants of the 19th century eugenics movement, like billionaire Bill Gates whose father was on the national board of directors for abortion provider Planned Parenthood.

While these are a few of the people known to advocate for eugenics policies and lead the Depopulation conspiracy, others remain hidden from the public eye.

“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s heading up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps ten or fifteen percent.” – Bill Gates


This article shows the long, sordid history of government power used to sterilize and kill “unfit” people to reduce global population in the name of bettering humanity.

The eugenics movement proves that some wealthy and powerful people have long wanted to eliminate undesirable segments of the population to preserve their way of life. These people see themselves as superior enough to manage what they perceive as a wild, out-of-control population of human animals.

While the eugenics movement may seem, on the surface, to be quiet or even dead, it has simply taken on a better disguise. It has morphed into what is now referred to as Neo-eugenics.

The Roe v. Wade decision cloaked eugenics with liberalism. Legalized abortion has, by de facto, furthered the eugenics movement – not only in the killing of millions of unwanted babies, but by creating a legal precedent for Neo-eugenics

Circumstantial evidence vs. Direct evidence

Overall death rates have soared in the U.S. since the recent COVID19 Plandemic and vaccine mandates.

There is no direct evidence, yet, that connects government policy to a depopulation plan, although the U.N. Agenda 2030 comes very close.

It’s all circumstantial evidence at the moment. But sterilization from the COVID shots may dramatically decrease the population into the future.

Already, human fertility has been dramatically damaged through poisons in the food, water and air that we consume. However, outright evidence of a direct and coordinated worldwide Depopulation Conspiracy is hard to find.

This makes the Depopulation Conspiracy mostly true, but not 100% true. As the evidence builds that the COVID19 shot was a deliberate depopulation tool, we may change this article’s rating from “mostly” true to “completely” true.

Regardless of our rating, the eugenics movement has been around for generations. It’s ideas, based on a false Malthusian ideology, continue to spread through fear mongering about overpopulation and climate change.

Sadly, eugenics is very much alive. Until we learn of the long standing dark intent of this movement, it will continue to prevail in the world.

Solutions to the Depopulation Conspiracy

How can we defeat the eugenics movement and any potential Depopulation Conspiracy? One simple solution is to have more children!

Many “developed” nations are in a severe demographic crunch. In countries like Japan, Poland and Italy, the population is actually shrinking. Even China expects to begin shrinking very soon, due to their One Child policy that was implemented in the 1980’s and 90’s.

China's population, projected in the futureIt’s refreshing to hear the richest man in the world, Elon Musk, say:

“If people don’t have more children, civilization is going to crumble. Mark my words.”

Former Pfizer executive and chief scientist, Mike Yeadon believes the COVID19 shots are part of a Depopulation Conspiracy. Still, he offers ways to fight back:

  1. Get offline, go outside
  2. If you’re young, leave the rich Western countries
  3. Educate others about what you know to be true
  4. Refuse the upcoming, mandatory digital ID system
  5. Refuse genetic vaccines (mRNA)
  6. Refuse central bank digital currencies (CBDCs)
  7. Use cash

Do you have other ideas about how to resist the Depopulation Conspiracy? Let us know in the comments below:



  1. Excellent work! Thank you for putting it all together for us! The push by the “dark” forces is unrelenting. To counteract it ,we need to be able to see it first. Piercing the veil of illusion does not happen all at once , well not for most of us . May we be inspired to do what is right for all of humanity,nature and life !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.